Template talk:deftempboiler

"dot" parameter doesn't work properly.
Conclusion: we should change line #64 of this template from this:


 *  -->

any objections to my making that change?

—Ruakh TALK 13:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ —Ruakh TALK 15:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Remove dot and ucfirst
Can someone tell me how to remove the final dot and ucfirst, such as I describe at WT:GP. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Meaning of third parameter
The third parameter is a gloss of participle or of what participle it is?--Dixtosa. 18:34, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Firstly — Please fix your signature to link more prominently to your user-page or talk-page.
 * Secondly — Neither; it's a gloss of the lexeme. For example, if the inflected form is a participle, then the lexeme is presumably a verb, so the gloss would most likely take the form “to ___”.
 * —Ruakh TALK 19:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

3
Why does 3, the gloss appear in italicized brackets? Renard Migrant (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I fixed it today. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

RFM discussion: July 2012–June 2018
There doesn't seem to be a crucial difference between these two templates, and they are both used for the same things. So I think merging them would be better, while adding the missing functionality of one to the other. See WT:GP for prior discussion. 11:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Any merge must be effected carefully so that transcluded instances are not affected. (Or at least so that transcluded instances of aren't affected. Preferably also, but it's been edited in a way that affects transcluded instances without those pages ever thereafter being checked for still-accuracy, so further bad edits wouldn't be the end of the world.) If that's done, I support. &#x200b;—msh210lic℠ (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Kept for lack of other action. --Genecioso (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)|