Template talk:dialect

RFM
I think they both denote the exact same thing, in which case they should probably be merged into one. -- Prince Kassad 19:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * They categorize identically, and seem to denote the same thing, but display differently (as dialect and dialectal, respectively), which may be useful in such constructions as { {rare|or|dialectal}} and . &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note also the existence of and . &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Though categorizes in Regional English, not just Regional. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect and  to  . When nouns are used attributively, it's very rarely in the plural, and there's no need to use the noun attributively when there's a perfectly good adjective dialectal. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Anyone redirecting must first check all uses of the template being modified to make sure they won't be ruined by said redirection. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Correct. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)