Template talk:ekk

RFM
We should delete this and use Template:et. Compare WT:RFM. - -sche (discuss) 22:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, delete. 22:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete from what I can tell, Standard Estonian language just redirects to Estonian language, suggesting they are the same. This is why oppose the idea that anything in ISO 639 should be allowed as a language. If it had zero errors, then sure, but it doesn't! Mglovesfun (talk) 09:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Someone needs to update WT:LANGTREAT when templates referenced there are deleted Chuck Entz (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Done (the template was not used in any entries or categories). As with : we usually keep dialect codes even when we consider dialects to be a single language (for some reason...even though it seems to me to unnecessarily open the door for the dialect codes to be improperly used), but we do not keep three-letter 'copies' of two-letter codes, so I have removed, like , from WT:LANGTREAT (which still notes the separateness of Latgalian from , and of Võro from ). - -sche (discuss) 18:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)