Template talk:el-poly-of

spelling
''moved from old template "el-polytonic form of" — Salt  marsh. 08:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * For the four templates about polytonic/monotonic (,, -it says 'script'-,  -it says 'script-. Perhaps unify the expression with: ...spelling of OR ...script of ? The form doesn't change. Well, a detail... --sarri.greek (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * perhaps we have a new template — can you think of a shorter name! —  Salt  marsh . 04:56, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , that spoils uniformity. Perhaps:
 * = Polytonic spelling of word
 * = Monotonic spelling of word (not mentioning Katharevousa specifically)
 * = In polytonic script: / or: Polytonic spelling: word (I do not know what expression is best)
 * = In monotonic script: / or: Monotonic spelling: word --sarri.greek (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Why didn't I think of that! It looks good. Would you like me to go ahead? — Salt  marsh . 05:23, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Done — Salt  marsh. 08:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Great work, please tell me: would you like me to chande and  to  and . I will gladly do it, if you give your blessing! But PLEASE: will their expression be 'script' or 'spelling'? --sarri.greek (talk) 21:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * You don't need my blessing, yes please do — thank you — Salt  marsh . 04:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ! script or spelling?? You know that I cannot trust my english. Would you prefer spelling at ALL of them... pray tell. --sarri.greek (talk) 04:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I would say spelling, it can always we changed later if we change our mind. — Salt  marsh . 04:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


 * done all templates, their linked pages updated, the documentations corrected. For some reason, at my browser, I can see the Template:el-poly-of/documentation correct, but I cannot see it when viewing Template:el-poly-of. Probably something wrong with my cache. I have marked the checked pages with {delete} just to make sure they will be not used again. Unless you wish to keep them. --sarri.greek (talk) 07:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

nocat and Module:form of/templates
Hello. Template el-poly-of cannot get a |nocat= param because line 92 at Module:form of/templates will not allow it. Module:parameters is needed but i do not know how to invoke one param out of it. The other module-template el-mono-of has similar problems, except the Category (it does not categorize) The other two templates el-poly and el-mono do not call this module. Ahh modules... This is not urgent at all. Please do not be disturbed during you summer vacation! Your sarri.greek (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Why is this nocat=1 needed? Because allll forms of polytonic lemmata like ἱκέτευσα would get into the Category:Polytonic Greek. (By the by, I would like to ask you about the problem of polytonic lemmata... in Septermber or later)
 * The module does not allow the param |l= (link=) which just writes the word: polytonic. But never mind that.
 * The module does not allow the expression . It demands a specified word: Lua error in Module:form_of/templates at line 197: No linked-to term specified; either specify term, alt, translit or transcription But when we direct to grc words, (example at εν) we need


 * I'm at home for a couple more weeks. My brain has obviously got to the stage where it loses info not need in the immediate future - I hardly remember writing this. I assume that this will usually be used as in, where it (correctly I assume) assigns it to Category:Polytonic Greek — in the absence of this template the assignation doesn't take place! I think I must be misunderstanding your point. We can expand into the other points when this is sorted. —  Salt  marsh . 17:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Correct, for . But I think that for all its forms like: ἄρχεται, ἄρχεσθε, ἄρχονται and so on: do they ALL get in the Polytonic Category AND the normal categories too? Normally i would use nocat=1 for them. Ohhh... Never mind. I can also write it manually. (And there is always the question of Polytonic in general: Are the Greek lemmas going to be semi-doubled in all their categories by polytonic versions?)  sarri.greek (talk) 17:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I think that the cat should contain all poly terms - not just the lemmas. And I should have said above that after a brief foray into module, and finding that the help files weren't much help, I gave up on them. In spite of the fact that they give you the bility to write much more versatile code than templates do. Keep well —  Salt  marsh . 05:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)