Template talk:eo-form of

Possible changes
I notice that this template never puts in capital letters or full stops. Oddly enough, every template I know of does that, including plural in other languages. I'd suggest moving to caps and full stops per precedent. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This template was based off of which also does not put capital letters or full stops. Changing this template would require a lot of work because it's used in many places where full stops would not be appropriate. If there is consensus that this should be changed anyway, I've made the necessary code here. --Yair rand 20:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Bug
The documentation states to use the model for compounds. However, this is the actual result of using that: Could anyone fix this? --JorisvS 14:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Yair rand (talk) 15:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Imperative → Volitive
The name of the -u form should be changed from "imperative" to "volitive", in accordance with Template:eo-head. See also the discussion at Wikidata:Wikidata talk:Lexicographical data for further arguments to support this change, and Template talk:eo-conj where I made a similar proposal. —Rajzin 19:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)