Template talk:etyl:mo

See also Template talk:mo. - -sche (discuss) 04:00, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:etyl:mo
We have already established that there is consensus around here that Moldavian is equal to Romanian. We had a vote, removed L2 headers, and made the category a soft redirect. So why do we still have a unused etymology template for a language that we have agreed is not a language? --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It's to be used in the etymology sections of words that originated in the Moldavian regional variety of Romanian, of which there are at least a few. Compare the BP discussion of frc and gkm. It's true that there probably aren't many entries this template can be used in, but that's true of a lot of our templates (, Kaya, comes to mind). - -sche (discuss) 01:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but see here. Moreover, even if someone did add etymologies from Moldavian variants (I certainly don't know any), those should probably be categorized along with other terms from Romanian. The Romanian entry would then specify that the word is a Moldavian regionalism. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, delete. 20:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 23:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)