Template talk:etym

Why would this be a bad redirection as was explained in the deletion summary? I'm inclined to reinstate it just because ain't that straightforward... neither for deciphering the abbreviation nor for memorizing it. --BiblbroX дискашн 15:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The only reason why is not named  is because when it was originally created.  already existed. It was however deleted in the meantime.  should be moved to  because the abbreviation etyl for etymology is brain-dead.  --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 02:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there any good reason not to implement this suggestion? Certainly there would need to be quite a bit of renaming, but that would be easy to bot, it seems to me. —Pinnerup (talk) 12:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)