Template talk:fr-adj-form

Gender and number section
Could it be possible to add m/f/p options for replacing, and  templates after this one? Maybe with just the letters mfp after fr-adj-form like it happens for Template:fr-noun. It would be simpler. Pharamp 17:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not very good with templates (ask Conrad.Irwin) but it would require a switch which would make the pages slower to load. For literally saving about 5 keystrokes, I'd be against it. But only slightly so. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The loading time is 100% negligible. — [&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 21:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the idea is not of saving 5 keystrokes but of having one autonomous template which doesn't depend on other templates for giving all the information we require. It's just a proposal, I think it could be a good improvement. Pharamp 19:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Conrad.Irwin 20:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * sidenote: Mglovesfun, don't worry about performance. A couple of extra microseconds does not a mountain make. w:WP:DWAP for more information. Conrad.Irwin 20:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * :) :) thanks Conrad!! Pharamp 22:07, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can I just add that I was totally wrong and this template is much better now. TY. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You're welcome!! Conrad, would it be possible to update WT:ACCEL with this change? Thanks! Pharamp 16:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * CodeCat removed the gender and number parameters unilaterally. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: July 2014–June 2015
As above, offers nothing that doesn't already. Renard Migrant (talk) 22:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect: If two templates do the same thing and both are used in articles, one should be redirected to the other and neither should be deleted. Pur ple back pack 89  03:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, a redirect wouldn't work. —CodeCat 13:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 20:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep simply calls  - basically, it already is a redirect. I don't see what significant benefit is gained from deleting a widely used template (nearly 13000 transclusions!) to replace it with something identical but slightly harder to type. Smurrayinchester (talk) 13:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Smurrayinchester. embryomystic (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Kept --IdotIdotI (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)