Template talk:hangulization of

RFDO discussion: January 2014–November 2015
I suggest to move to normal. Hangulization is not a very common term, Korean loanwords are no different from others, Hangeul is the only current writing system in both Koreas (with occasional Hanja) and Cyrillic based loanwords are not called "cyrillization of", we don't have arabization, katakanization, etc.

The spelling "hangul" is based on McCune–Reischauer romanisation of "hangŭl", the official spelling in South Korea is "hangeul", so is the more modern spelling. North Korea uses the term "Chosŏn'gŭl" -. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 03:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but "Hangul" is by far the more common spelling in English. But either way, I agree the template should be deleted. (This is more of an WT:RFDO thing, but I personally don't really care which page the discussion is on.) --WikiTiki89 04:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * OK, I moved the page here, since it's not simply a deletion, should be orphaned first. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 05:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Well it is simply a deletion. We always orphan templates before deleting them. It's not a move, because we're not moving the template. --WikiTiki89 08:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned and deleted. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)