Template talk:hashtag

RFDO discussion: January–September 2016
It was used once in Beer parlour, and I removed that use in since I disagree with it. It placed the Beer parlour page to a category like Category:Hashtag/MediawikiHoldsWiktionaryBack; I don't think this is appropriate. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted, per WT:DELETE, first reason. --kc_kennylau (talk) 13:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a nice and in a very relatable way to tag discussions. --Dixtosa (talk) 14:19, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't find it nice or relatable as it's not an actual hashtag. It's ugly and difficult to use. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I like the idea. It would be nice to have an easy way to find important old discussions without having to search the archives.
 * Instead of using categorisation, we could make the template generate an invisible link so that the tagged pages can be found via What Links Here. This should make it more palatable to the people who don’t like hashtags. — Ungoliant (falai) 14:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, I like the idea. Also, the reason for speedy deletion as "complete rubbish" is completely invalid. "Complete rubbish" would have been if the contents had been completely unusable, such as a random string of characters. --WikiTiki89 16:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * While I'm unsure about the idea, I think the actual implementation is messy an irritating and it should be kept as it is. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * RFD kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)