Template talk:hi-adj-ind

Why does this exist if the adjective is already indeclinable? DerekWinters (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To show that all the forms are the same, I would imagine. Indeclinable doesn't mean the word has no case forms after all. —CodeCat 21:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * But then the page would simply say indeclinable, if anything. We don't provide the subjunctive verbal forms in English, even though they do exist and have existed historically. And we also don't do give the eight case forms that some authors prefer to give for Indian languages, though they too exist. I just think it would be less confusing to do without the table. DerekWinters (talk) 02:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)