Template talk:ib

RFDO discussion
Redirects to Template:italbrac. Not used; I replaced all instances with about a week ago, and since nobody has used this in that time, that tells me it can be safely deleted. Furthermore (and not strictly on topic) I don't understand how and  are not fully redundant to each other. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The difference between and  is IMHO that one specifies the an explicit style (italic and in brackets) no matter what the functionality of the text is, while the other specifies the function of that text. I believe that the latter approach is much more useful, as Wiktionary's formating will most likely change over time. On the other hand a template defining the semantics can be very easily changed, i.e. with a bot.Matthias Buchmeier 18:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep this (old) template for six or twelve months to see if it's used in the mean while. If not, delete. A week is nothing. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * But it is two-letter, and those are reserved for 639-1 codes. -- Prince Kassad 19:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Someone (RU?) has mentioned that, as they're assigning three-letter codes now, it's highly unlikely that they'll assign any more two-letter ones. So I doubt this will be a problem. So if it's used, keep it, I say. (And if it's unused, delete it, and we'll know that in six or twelve months.) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It is still possible, but only for languages which are not yet coded into ISO. For example, Montenegrin could get the language code if desired. -- Prince Kassad 20:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Have found one use since December 6 - in millionaire. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. —Ruakh TALK 18:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)