Template talk:indeclinable

This is a context label, but inflectional information isn't a context. It would be a bit like using "plural in -ren" on. Such information belongs either on the headword line or in an inflection section. 14:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Disagree, because a word may be indeclinable for one definition but not for another, but be from the same etymology. So it needs to be used as a context label sometimes, and sometimes as part of the inflection line. We sometimes do put plurals of English words in context labels for the same reason. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you give an example of that? It seems that by far the most uses of this label are actually (incorrectly) on the headword line, and very few are on the definition line. 14:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * In fairness... no. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The declinability of Latin depends on usage, but it's a rare exception.  In Latin, indeclinable is marked on the headword line, and is indicated in the Inflection section, and so Latin does not make use of the template  . --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Also, it used to show (indeclinable) (in round brackets and italic), now just "indeclinable". --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That's because it is a context label. And we don't add inflectional information in translations. 11:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * @Anatoli: Where is it used? I've never seen this template in use anywhere. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)