Template talk:ja-pos

Clever bit of code if you want it
For the part of speech switch, is it possible to use  and anything that isn't in the switch will categorize as s, such as  would categorize in Category:Japanese adverb forms. It has to come last or else it will bypass the other elements of the switch. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Suggestions and move request
Move request: ja-head would have been a better name which is consistent with and l/xx templates. I mean ja-head would imply that this template imitates except that now the language code fixed (as l/xx templates do).

Also, the part of speech parameter should only expect "proper noun". I am sure this will remove one  statement making it a little faster. Also, it should not complain by being passed "verb" as a parameter. --Dixtosa (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Unnecessary romanized capitalizations for proper nouns
, the recently added redlinks relating to the 2= and rom= parameters.

For example, had only the romanized links Daijō-kan and Ōimatsurigoto no Tsukasa, now new redlinks such as Daijō-Kan, Ōimatsurigoto No Tsukasa, Ōimatsurigotonotsukasa, etc. appeared out of nowhere. Any fixes? ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 22:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * How is it now? -- Huhu9001 (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * looks good, thanks! There's still one more problem though: in Etymologies 1 and 2 have the 2= parameter as か な (with a space between them) instead of かな as in the displaytitle, while the rom= end up to be both kana and ka na. Is this intentional? ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 19:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes. If you don't want it, use  or  . -- Huhu9001 (talk) 03:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Did you remove automatic capitalization for  altogether?  For example,  is showing a redlinked romanization of ōshima, which would work if it was correctly capitalized as Ōshima. 98.110.34.140 03:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Four-kana dialect
Such dialacts exist in Kyuushu and Shikoku islands, with 157.230.159.121 13:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)