Template talk:l/he

RFM discussion: September–December 2015
Should be renamed to (along the lines of other language-specific templates of this kind, such as  and ), leaving the current name as a redirect. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. Plain redirects are very easy to orphan, I already have a bot script to do it. Do we need to keep it? —CodeCat 23:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, another thing. is actually a shortcut redirect; the full name of the template is . Should we rename it  instead and make  a shortcut? —CodeCat 23:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Pretty neutral about this, I guess it'll look a bit weird in list having and  mixed (we try to only use it when it's needed). Don't forget there's also . Enosh (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Moved: --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:l/he → Template:he-l
 * Template:m/he → Template:he-m


 * Hold on. I never noticed this discussion, but I have expressed my opposition to this at WT:RFDO. I am still opposed, partly for the reason Enoshd stated above. would only make sense if all Hebrew links were to use it, but it is only intended to be used by a minority of Hebrew links that can be mixed in with ordinary  links. --WikiTiki89 04:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

RFD discussion: June 2015–January 2022

 * See Template talk:l/bg.