Template talk:la-pronoun-form

RFD discussion: April 2019–June 2023
Does nothing useful and nothing Latin-specific. Can easily be replaced by. —Rua (mew) 19:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * In general things that save keystrokes should be kept, but in this case I agree with you because non-lemma pages should be generated by bot or gadget, not by hand. For Russian, for example, we have only, and use for everything else. Benwing2 (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * There are more considerations than just saving keystrokes. If every language has its own copy of just for the sake of saving keystrokes, then something is wrong. They can just use the generic, what else do we have it for? We shouldn't encourage laziness to the point that people find 24 characters too much but not 19. —Rua (mew) 17:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , could you take a look at handling this and the next few sections according to your plans? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - more template standardisation please. No reason to have this separated off, and it's a potential maintenance headache. Theknightwho (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Deprecate as redundant but widely used. &mdash; excarnateSojourner (talk &middot; contrib) 08:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Deleted (< 1000 uses). Benwing2 (talk) 23:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)