Template talk:ladecl1&2

To delete?
I'm pretty sure I've seen remove this from entries. I think it should certainly be removed when there is a declension template, such as as it's obviously redundant. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's redundant to the inflection line as well, and and I have been removing them over the years. Caladon 18:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Template:ladecl1&2
Per Template talk:ladecl1&2, redundant to other templates such as and. It's already being removed; this just formalizes that. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC) with
 * Yes, but it needs to be deleted from over a hundred entries first. SemperBlotto 07:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That in itself isn't too difficult; essentially the same system I used to remove would work for this. What that system wouldn't do is detect if it needs to be replaced by another template. Having said that, that's not impossible either; I could replace:


 * To be honest if it fails we may as well remove all uses of it and just check the entries manually for lack of declension templates; that's essentially what we do for all entries in all languages, the level of inconsistency in our entries being so high. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, I don't think there really is much use for these templates. —CodeCat 13:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * FWIW that replacement looks like . --Mglovesfun (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * RFD-failed, deleted by EncycloPetey in September. Am not seeing any objections, so based on this discussion, am closing this thread. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)