Template talk:langscript

3 scripts
This isn't working when a language is written in 3 or more scripts like Azeri. --Vahagn Petrosyan 18:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. The template now should work with languages written in up to four scripts. --Daniel. 19:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

nisan
Can you point me to the guideline on this. I don't quite get why Japanese can have an entry but not Hebrew.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  22:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Me neither. The rule is, we don't include transliterations. Japanese is an exception, as are some other Oriental languages, I think, but I have no idea why (or which). Hebrew, OTOH, is not an exception. That said, there is an English word Nisan, for which we have an entry. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you asked for a pointer to the rule, and I didn't provide one. Actually, I don't know where this rule is, if it's written anywhere. But it exists anyway. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * At least in theory, Japanese has three scripts, and the Latin script is one of them. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps someone should update template:langscript then. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Saved secondary scripts
I've saved these from the old version of langscript. —CodeCat 11:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * az2=Cyrl
 * az3=Arab
 * ban2=Bali
 * brx2=Latn
 * bug2=Latn
 * cel-gau2=Grek
 * cr2=Latn
 * crh2=Cyrl
 * gag2=Cyrl
 * got2=Latn
 * ha2=Arab
 * hmn2=Hmng
 * iu2=Latn
 * ja2=Latn
 * jv2=Java
 * kaa2=Cyrl
 * ks2=Deva
 * ku2=Latn
 * lad2=Latn
 * lzz2=Latn
 * men2=Mend
 * mo2=Cyrl
 * oj2=Latn
 * pa2=Guru
 * saz2=Latn
 * saz3=Taml
 * saz4=Deva
 * sh2=Latn
 * sr2=Latn
 * su2=Sund
 * tk2=Cyrl
 * tt2=Latn
 * tt3=Arab
 * ug2=Latn
 * ug3=Cyrl
 * uz2=Cyrl
 * vi2=Hani
 * za2=Hani

Template:langscript
Like above, this template became somewhat less used when we moved over to /script subtemplates. It should be orphaned by now, but the software needs time to catch up so it's still listing some transclusions. Also, I wonder if I would need to nominate other templates that are part of our template language infrastructure? Like or, which are becoming orphaned and obsolete as more uses are being converted to Module:language utilities. 22:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Re your "Also…": Please don't get rid of unless modules are substable. I use it in User:Msh210/format.js to find the code of a language given its name; it's very useful. (It can, however, be converted to subst-only, if that's its only use; and then it can AFAICT be converted to call the module instead of having its own lookup table.) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Modules are substable.  gives: Latn.  19:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * RFD-failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)