Template talk:list:ordinals from zeroth to forty-ninth/en

Deleted per WT:RFDO:

Template:list:cardinals from zero to forty-nine/en
Not used. If we really want to make this kind of list it should have a different form (like Appendix or the like).--Dixtosa (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * --Dixtosa (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even supposing one would want this kind of brute-force method of showing variation in numeral formation, fifty is excessive. Almost all the languages I've studied show no difference in formation strategy between the thirties and fourties (or seventies, for that matter). In English, there's the archaic use of score, so that "two score and nine" is different from thirty-nine, but that's not included here.
 * I don't see the purpose of having links to fifty numbers in one language section- does anyone benefit from being able to click on forty-three in the sixteen entry? It seems more like a stunt than anything useful. I would add all the other subtemplates, too: only the Navajo, Telegu and Russian subtemplates are transcluded at all, and half of the Navajo links are redlinks.
 * List templates in general use a disproportionate amount of system resources for minimal benefits, but this bunch is particularly bad. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No, they do not :?
 * Actually they save much space as you do not have to put the same list all over. This is why I am thinking of creating templates for each group related terms. At least for such long lists: #Related_terms, членство. --Dixtosa (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Replace with appendices, which have way more potential value, as they can readily accommodate language peculiarities, archaisms etc. DCDuring TALK 21:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

this one too--Dixtosa (talk) 21:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete both. We have this info in appendixes. --Celui qui crée ébauches de football anglais (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Barytonesis (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)