Template talk:lvs

RFM
Should we merge into  and delete the former? - -sche (discuss) 11:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think so, yes. Unless there is a pressing reason why 'Standard Latvian' is not 'Latvian'. 13:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ugh yes, I mean, what the Hell? Mglovesfun (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see, there is no reason. Of course, there are Latvian dialects, but as is the case with most languages the simple language name is used for the standard variety. --Pereru (talk) 02:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Done. We sometimes keep dialect codes even when we recognise the dialects as one language, but we do not keep three-letter variants of two-letter codes, so I have deleted . - -sche (discuss) 22:19, 23 August 2012 (UTC)