Template talk:merge

ns switch
Each time this is misused in NS:0, it should add itself to a cleanup category and display instead. Right? --Connel MacKenzie 15:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * We do redirect some variants of idiomatic phrases, and between titles with digraphs and those with separate unicode characters, so this could be useful in NS:0. --Bequw → τ 12:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

RFM discussion: March 2018–October 2022
In an almost ridiculous turn of events, this template should itself be merged into. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 08:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, it seems like rfm should default to "suggests that this ... be moved, merged or split" and should (does?) have a parameter to specify which one, and then merge and move and split should be shells that just consist of or the like. - -sche (discuss) 17:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * -sche's proposal. I oppose just deleting, , and , because I appreciate the specificity they give. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 06:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * This should probably be done now, because I got confused looking at the template, not sure if what I was seeing was the output of the template, or an actual RFM message! —Rua (mew) 20:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)