Template talk:module

Very similar to Template:temp
This is deliberately almost identical to, however it does mean that unless you click on or hover over the link displayed, you can't tell if the namespace is Template or Module. For example and  both produce links that look identical. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Serious mistake IMO. I think that if this template must exist, it really should be distinguished. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:module
A template for formatting links to modules. Very misleading, because its output is basically identical to. I would like to keep this, but only if it looks different. Then again, do we really need it? Can't we just type Module:foo? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Misleading indeed. Something like might make more sense but even then, how often would that actually be needed?  00:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd like there to be a -like template for linking to modules. If that's what this is, I don't understand why would be a better title. - -sche (discuss) 04:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Well ok, let's say we use . Then you'd type: . Now replace the { } with [ ] and the | with :, and you have Module:nl-verb. I really don't see the advantage in having a template just for that... 14:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair point. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The difference is, if I've understood, with you can provide other parameters to show how to use the template, such as, but for  this won't work. Am I right? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * RFD-failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)