Template talk:new trans table

Deletion debate
Tagged by User:Rodasmith. Unused, virtually identical and problematic. They create a translation table that can't be edited in the normal way, only "assisted". So if you make a mistake, I don't think you can remove it. Anyway delete unused and not needed. Mglovesfun (talk) 06:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I think these are used for ing, I've certainly seen people edit as though they were substing in all the empty trans tables, then edit the page to change the glosses, and then use "assisted" for the translations after that. Conrad.Irwin 13:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * In fairness


 * 1) I didn't tag these, I justed finished the nomination.
 * 2) Yeah, I only thought of that this afternoon when I was out. So yes, keep. What's the harm? Mglovesfun (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete and keep, per nom. ;-) OK, mostly keep, barring further arguments. -- Visviva 05:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Kept Mglovesfun (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)