Template talk:no-noun-infl

Bug?
Check out. __meco 10:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * When rewriting the template, the class names became different from the ones in Bokmålsordboka/Nynorskordboka. Now, I have changed back to the old system. Kåre-Olav 15:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem seems to linger partially. __meco 15:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * fixed at rumpe; there may be other instances: look for the nouns in Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:no-noun-infl ending in -e. Kåre-Olav 20:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

More bugs
__meco 09:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * floskel
 * stue


 * I believe that I've solved the first one. The second one had simply been given an incorrect class. --Harald Khan  Ճ  10:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Help needed
Can I get som help with ? __meco 15:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have any references for those particular classes? Using an irregular inflection class might be appropriate here, I think. Btw, this suggests that perhaps tsjakra is more correct, though snl.no uses chakra (as well as the masculine inflection form chakraen). --Harald Khan  Ճ  16:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's bad. The linguists are obviously totally disconnected from the population segment where this word is being used. __meco 19:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

nb-class=4 bug
See, etc. Ram3ai (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

dp-bracket, ip-bracket and ds-bracket unused and broken?
I was going through some error message logs for another project that parser Wiktionary data (kaikki.org > dictionaries > diagnostics > debug messages > subpage 1 currently) and found a ton of errors relating to no-noun-infl and nn-noun-table:, , had in some cases three arguments when they should have max two as { – }'s. Turned out the parser I use isn't broken in this case (as it often is), but that there's some bad nesting with dp-bracket and ip-bracket and is-bracket in this template (and others). However, I tried to search the page data we have of wiktionary articles and couldn't find any instance of dp-bracket, is-bracket or ds-bracket being used as a template argument, it's only referenced inside the nn-noun-table and no-noun-infl templates, which is probably why now one's noticed this before. I'm not going to start poking at this in case there's something I haven't understood, and it's not broken on the Wiktionary side of things (because the -bracket parameters are unused?), but still. I think the fix is just to fix the nesting so that the arguments are in the correct place; this error happens in a few places, iirc. Kristian-Clausal (talk) 12:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)