Template talk:of a person

Not needed; just use. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Apparently created to get it off of Special:WantedTemplates. Not a good enough reason IMO, delete. No opinion &mdash;Internoob (Disc•Cont) 18:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 19:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If that's true, it should never have been made. The way works, it will always put stuff on that list. Delete in favor of using . &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The main reason to create any template is to categorize, as in terms of displaying text, context does this well already. Any context template that doesn't categorize simply saves eight keystrokes -  instead of . But deleting them probably doesn't achieve much, if anything. For example would we get rid of  or . Similarly,  achieves the same thing; it saves a few keystrokes with no other advantages, right? Mglovesfun (talk) 09:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think "Of a person," should be a part of the definition rather than being marked as a context. --Dan Polansky 09:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Was deleted already. --Chicken is fun (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)