Template talk:oge-noun

RFDO discussion: April–July 2015
I do not know how to design this template and we do not have Old Georgian entry format standard, so is the way to go.

Almost never used. Today it got resurrected and orphaned by me immediately--Dixtosa (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the face of it, it has plural and uncountable parameters which look useful. Unless Old Georgian nouns do not have plurals (or none that are attestable) and are never uncountable, I'd say keep it. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Old Georgian nouns have plural (often two) and they are generally attestable, but they also have 19 other inflectional forms and I am no longer sure plural should be promoted among them. To be honest I was never sure, when I created oge-noun I just mimicked en-noun.
 * The same applies to ka-noun, unfortunately. I am not sure which form to promote. So in order to not let oge-noun prevail, like ka-noun did, we had better delete it.
 * I ll recreate it when I am sure.--Dixtosa (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Orphaned and deleted. --Vahag (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)