Template talk:pages needing translation

These don't seem to be used for anything, and I'm not sure what they should be used for or why there are categories for each month. 17:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. — Ungoliant (Falai) 17:40, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think this was somehow connected to the use of . DCDuring TALK 18:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Is, not was. Strong keep the categories as used and useful, and the template as linking among them. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Who has used ? When was the last time? I cannot find the template transcluded in N0, nor the words "not written in English". I strongly suspect that the volumes of items does not now require twelves separate pages and that it will not require it in the next ten years or more. A simple single category that displayed the oldest and newest additions to the category should cover it. DCDuring TALK 21:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I use it occasionally. I mean, five or six times a year. Usually I either speedy delete whatever it is or fix it myself. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I use it occasionally. I mean, perhaps five or six times a year. (To paraphrase a wise man.) Anyway, I agree that, volume-wise, it's not worth twelve categories. But because the pages are up for deletion after a month, we need separate categories to go through to spot distantly-tagged entries. I suppose with the volume we have now, one could instead inspect the page history to see when the page was tagged, but, hey, whom do the categories hurt? I still say strong keep. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * We have the ability to display category additions by date with great ease. I am not sure what the limit is on the number of items that can be so displayed, but it well exceeds a dozen. DCDuring TALK 23:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That seems like a sufficient substitute, if we can display that order in the category page itself. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 02:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have inserted the tables to display the 10 oldest and newest additions to the main category as best I can. Some wikiknowledge might improve the appearance. I haven't tested it, but I have used the tables before in other categories, at least those not rendered overly complicated by Daniel.. DCDuring TALK 04:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The 12 linking categories all tagged for speedy deletion. The template itself is redirected. --ElisaVan (talk) 14:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)