Template talk:proper noun

This doesn't really seem like it could be a context... --Yair rand 13:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not actually a context template. IMO check uses. It's used as a context template; most of those can doubtless be orphaned, probably all; if any can't then I suppose keep. If there's other use, perhaps keep depending on what that use is. Otherwise delete.—msh210℠ on a public computer 14:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it predates which is why it isn't formatted as a context label. I suspect it should be replaced with  or just removed in some cases. I will however, look into it before saying delete. A lot of the transclusions seem to be not in the main namespace. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, I've removed the obvious misuses, including one typo ( instead of ). For entries like PDF I separate the entry by part of speech, as opposed to 'Initialism' with the part of speech being given in a context label. The two remaining entries in the main namespace are curl and terra. For terra, it claims that it's a capitalized proper noun Terra so I should move it there, I just think it might not be capitalized in the given sense. For curl, it's a bit beyond me. Again, if the label is to be believed, there is a proper noun 'curl'. Though, I don't think it is. The transclusions in the appendix namespace are all . Mglovesfun (talk) 21:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Been deleted --Chicken is fun (talk) 15:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)