Template talk:rfclarify

Misnamed?
Shouldn't this be ? --Connel MacKenzie 21:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It is now. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

2010 update
This template should use like the others of its type. Also, there's no real point in displaying the language as it's always the same as the section it's in. Also I think we should restore the original title of as that's become standard here now, unlike when this was renamed. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Currently it should only be used for non-English definitions. I don't see why that is. It should use . Mglovesfun (talk) 23:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It also uses language names, not codes. I'll let someone else 'fix' that. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Change of wording
For consistency with other request templates, the message should say something like "Can we add a clarification of this definition?". Tc14Hd (talk) 23:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

fixing error category
How should entries in Category:Pages_using_bad_params_when_calling_Template:rfclarify be fixed? Ping who added parameter checks. Jberkel 18:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Jberkel It looks like param 2 isn't used, which is why it gives the warning, since some people have put notes there. I've added it as an extra allowed parameter, since it seems like a reasonable thing to do. Theknightwho (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * 👍 Jberkel 20:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)