Template talk:rfvResult

Template:rfvResult
We deleted because it was redundant to. This appears to be no different, a bot could do these in just a few minutes, as I think they use the same parameters. In fact if that's the case, a simple redirect would fix it. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Fails, as "uncontroversial". Mglovesfun (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant to . Someone should delete the template. --Dan Polansky 09:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

It's transcluded in a number of pages. So I've redirected it to template:rfv-archived (with which it shares the parameter name). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC)