Template talk:sco-pl

Template:sco-pl
Pointless; just use which is what we do for (AFAICT) every other language. (like ) might be justifiable if we have any Scots pluralia tantum, which judging by the redness of the link, we don't. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * My mistake, it does exist; I typoed. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably worth orphaning even if kept. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Not kept, deleted. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)