Template talk:seeTalk

Deprecate?
Does this have to be, or should it be, fully deprecated and deleted? It could be refined a little to work for all name spaces, apart from the main one (where it should never be used). Mglovesfun (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to use this template now that we have . IMO this should be fully deprecated and deleted. --Yair rand (talk) 19:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I use it on one of my user subpages. Although I could just  it and it would be fine. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Or totally transform, use . Something along those lines. It can sometimes be useful for non-templates. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Template:seeTalk
Superseded by and orphaned. --Bequw → τ 23:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete is certainly an option. It was used on some user subpages, including one of mine, but it isn't worth keeping it just for that as it's perfectly possible to write it out by hand For further information, please see |the talk page. Ergo delete, otherwise I think users will continue to use it, not realising that exists. The other sensible option would be to produce an error message when the template it used on a templates  . That might be better than having a red link on templates. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Making it a redirect to would make more sense. That way people will automatically know that it has been superceded AND they'll find the proper one to use. —CodeCat 09:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, a deletion summary indicating the correct template should suffice for that. But redirection would help in case seeTalk is in fact used. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)