Template talk:substub

RFDO discussion: March 2014–August 2015
I have never seen this template used to any good effect. Mostly it is used in entries that are speedily deleted. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ditto. Delete. Keφr 16:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Changing my mind. It at least allows us to find useless pages quickly. What will be the replacement for Category:Section stubs? — Keφr 15:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Is the RfD for the redirect or both the redirect and the redirect target? DCDuring TALK 16:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:sectstub
For the sake of clarity, delete; see also above. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete this as well, but note:- it is used in some "new en" templates. SemperBlotto (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I have orphaned both templates and deleted them. If there is no reason to keep Category:Section stubs, I intend to delete it, too. - -sche (discuss) 08:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)