Template talk:tr-conj

Adding the past indefinite form to this template
I propose to add the past indefinite form after the past definite form (like gelişmişim after geliştim for the first person singular) as a good idea. What do you think? Sae1962 (talk) 10:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course, that completely makes sense. I can't spend much time here nowadays, but I was working on a more complicated template. It'd be cool to have your opinions as another speaker of Turkish. I guess I didn't miss a tense, but two heads are better than one. Sinek (talk) 11:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Intelligent links to the words
What do you think about intelligent links in the template that become active, if the word exist, and remain normal colour otherwise? I added for the verb yaratmak the verb form yaratmaz, which cannot be seen when contemplating the template at yaratmak. Sae1962 (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It's because only positive declarative forms are linked on the main template itself. Sinek (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Can this template be used for programlamak?
Can this template be used for programlamak? If it can, please document it, as it seems to be non-trivial. Thanks! Sae1962 (talk) 08:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Template:tr-conj-v must be used with the verbs ending in a vowel (without the infinitive suffix). See ağlamak for the usage. Sinek (talk) 08:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Template for the negative verb forms
Each Turkish verb has a negative form, like and,  and ,  and. It would be nice to have the template expanded such that it can create the conjugation of the negative verb forms. --Sae1962 (talk) 14:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Problems with verbs such as gütmek and gitmek
In these verbs /t/ must turn into /d/ in continuos and future tense and stay /t/ in past tense, how to obtain both? Thanks --Anylai (talk) 15:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

I fixed the template
User:Betseg/tr-conj-template for the fixed template, User:Betseg/tr-conj-article for examples. (yes, I did merge the vowel template into it). I think a supervised bot can replace all current entries' templates, and add the template to ones that don't have the template, and add the template to irregular verbs' entries? -- betseg &#124; g 05:16, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Alternative forms
Based on this discussion, I suggested we add alternative forms for the 3rd person plural of the direct past imperfective and of the indirect aorist tenses. What do you think? A455bcd9 (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)