Template talk:uncommon

Currently, this redirects to. However, as we all know, uncommon ≠ rare. Personally, I think the connotative differences are so great that even if we categorise these entries as rare, we should display the context tag as (uncommon). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, but it would help if we could establish what we mean. The only things I'm sure of is that terms only used in a single work are "rare" and "uncommon" words are more frequently occurring than "rare" words. We should be able to stand on our hind legs and commit to something more specific, though we never did about "common misspellings". DCDuring TALK 05:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, all we need to do is undo Daniel Carrero's last edit. I say go for it. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Done, striking. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)