Template talk:univerbation

Weird way to use it
While I find this template useful, the way it works and displays things is a bit weird. For me, the most natural use is like this:. But the documentation page suggests instead that each word be put in its own parameter, and the result is then that the template puts + signs between the words. This strikes me as kind of unnatural. is a single phrase, so it should be displayed as such, not with plus signs as if it were a compound. Maybe you had something else in mind when you made this, or maybe I'm using it in an unintended way. What do you think? —Rua (mew) 19:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)