Template talk:urj-desc

Well, there's no documentation yet so I don't know if this is actually possible or nor, but it seems like this template could use a little more flexibility: --Tropylium (talk) 02:29, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Tundra Nenets and Forest Nenets certainly ought to be separated. Probably Hill Mari and Meadow Mari as well.
 * Selkup, Mansi and Khanty have a large number of dialects and it would be handy to be able to indicate what dialects the data is from (especially if a word is absent from the standard languages based on Northern Mansi, Northern Khanty and Northern Selkup). Proto-Mansi, Khanty and Selkup have been reconstructed so those might be usable as the top-level nodes (though I guess it'll be a long time until that data has been added to Wiktionary in any completeness).
 * Meanwhile Southern Samoyedic and Northern Samoyedic seem like not very useful nodes here. These are neither reconstructed nor universally accepted. Ditto Western Sami and Eastern Sami.
 * The high-level nodes (Finno-Ugric, Ugric, Finno-Permic) are likewise unreconstructed and somewhat disputed - or, at least, their reconstructions are indistinguishable from Proto-Uralic. What to do with them is less obvious (see discussion at Wiktionary talk:About Proto-Uralic).