Template talk:warn

Request for deletion
This template really messes up entries, making it look like the entry is really incorrect, when it's actually only used for entries that have passed rfv. What's wrong with for neologisms? That does the same job without suggesting that the entry may be of low quality or reliability. --Yair rand 04:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah this is a pretty bad template, it could perhaps be simplified and turned into usage notes. The thing is, we accept neologisms as long as they are attested, so what does this actually do? In short, delete or redo entirely as pointed out, it's big, ugly and serves no purpose. Mglovesfun (talk) 07:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, use . --Bequw → ¢ • τ 20:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Fails, is still used; get your orphaning boots on. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)