Template talk:wi

RFDO discussion: March 2016
It's just Template:w but with italics. To me this is pretty obviously Daniel running away with his template-o-philia, and creating shit we don't need (who could possibly need this?!) out of the sheer binary bit-dick-thrusting pleasure of creating stupid shit. We need to stamp on this crap and kill it. If you want italics, we already have a perfectly good way to do italics, which I showed in the beginning of this sentence. We do not need two versions of every template, a plain version and an italic version. Hopefully I don't need to show why this is stupid, but let's just suppose that we want to show some text either in italics, bold, underline, or italics AND bold, or italics AND underline, or all three, or etc.... this is not why we have templates. It's just gratuitous code-fuckery. We need to stop this. Who is with me? Equinox ◑ 23:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree that the template should remain deleted. I disagree with the assholish parts, but I'm going to assume that you've just been drinking again. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * LOL, you are completely right and I apologise for being a dick. Sometimes the beer wants to talk. I still agree with nominating this for deletion but I did it in a very stupid way. Equinox ◑ 03:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem. Also, I don't mind about the template remaining deleted. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree with this deletion; reminds me of Wonderfool's which was just  (and yes some other languages use the spelling wikipédia). Renard Migrant (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)