Template talk:yi-conj-head

RFD discussion: June 2015–October 2021
No longer needed --Type56op9 (talk) 12:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * There are still two transclusions that the new template does not yet support. --WikiTiki89 15:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , your yearly (or whatever it is) reminder. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep. Haven't forgotten. I'll get to it. --WikiTiki89 15:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you please fix these two? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it's not a simple fix. I have to implement a whole new feature in Mod:yi-verb. I'll get around to it when I have time. Perhaps we should close this discussion as a keep and renominate it later? --WikiTiki89 14:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That seems sensible to me but it would be nice if we can ensure that it's on a to-do list somewhere. What is it about these two verbs that is so tricky? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * They are phrasal verbs, which the conjugation template does not support yet. I've been planning to add it, as it would be useful in general (not just for these two verbs). --WikiTiki89 18:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * another reminder... --I learned some phrases (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It would be good to be able to mark the phrasal/periphrastic verbs as such, via a category or in the headword perhaps --Gausie (talk) 08:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * As a stop-gap solution, I replaced the two transclusions with a new template,, based on how we handle similar cases in Dutch, where we have . See for example . What do you think? — Mnemosientje (t · c) 15:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Great, so delete the template already Yellow is the colour (talk) 22:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted after having been forgotten about for a while. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)