Template talk:zh-historical-dict

Untitled section
See Talk:㫃 for related discussion. Dokurrat (talk) 10:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Categorization
Hi, now this template on entry 屙 is broken. Any idea how to fix? Dokurrat (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oops, I forget that you've been using this for as well. The issue here is that it conflicts with Module:zh-forms. There are two solutions I can think of: (1) Remove the categorization (but that means the entry itself does not enter Category:Chinese terms with obsolete senses) (2) Create a separate template for the purpose of having the tooltip sign. I can then search through entries where the template is used for this purpose and list it out for you.
 * Fixing Module:zh-forms will categorize any entry using this template. Or would you prefer to just use instead? KevinUp (talk) 08:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't mind creating a separate template for usages in . Dokurrat (talk) 08:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems like we already have . Okay, the following entries have such usages: . KevinUp (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Roger, thanks! Dokurrat (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

polysyllabic words
Can this template be used for polysyllabic words? If not, should I use instead? (I like the OED label "rare-0" for terms with no citations.) --Dine2016 (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)