Template talk:zh-sum of parts

Is this different from Template:&lit? Talk:sum of parts also makes me wonder if we should be using the phrase "sum of parts" in entry text. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 21:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No, no different from it. Per my memory, I first used this expression in entry 好好, as I agree what said in Talk:好好 He also talked about it didn't support to Chinese terms, which is not my reason and it seems works well with Chinese terms. Maybe it wasn't then? Maybe he's talking about something I dunno? Dokurrat (talk) 02:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC) as I think it was a neater expression. CC: . Dokurrat (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC) (modified)
 * Perhaps Wyang was referring to how it cannot use zh-l (which is also probably why we have templates like zh-alt-form). —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

RFD discussion: September–November 2020
See Template talk:zh-sum of parts. —Suzukaze-c (talk) 08:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)