Template talk:zh-tone

Request for deletion
The entries that we use it in are in the process of being deleted, ou having failed RFD. —Internoob (Disc.•Cont.) 00:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * How the hell are you going to delete all these entries without any input from our only competent Mandarin editor? Fucking disgraceful. — [&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 20:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Surely they can comment here as much as anyone else can? I'll put a link here from WT:AZH. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Not everyone monitors this vastly depressing page. — [&#32;R·I·C&#32;] opiaterein — 15:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per nomination. It's not incorrect and it's still used. Should only be deleted if all the entries using it fail RFD. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but toneless pinyin as failed RFD. I don't see why it all shouldn't be deleted as per the precedents at ou and ojo. I invite anyone who is dissatisfied to bring the issue back up on the BP or elsewhere, and I will suspend my activities in the interim.
 * I recognize that the template is still in use, and I of course wouldn't delete it until it wasn't used anymore, but still I think it ought to be deleted eventually. Neither is it incorrect. —Internoob (Disc.•Cont.) 00:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, unless Internoob can point to the supposed discussion where all toneless pinyin "failed RfD". bd2412 T 02:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah it has to be the other way around. We can delete this if/when all the entries that use it also fail RFD. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Kept


 * the template was subsequently superseded by cmn-toneless-note, which it ended up just transcluding. - -sche (discuss) 07:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)