Thesaurus talk:moon of Uranus

Wikisaurus:moon of Pluto
None of these pages lists a single synonym! The content that they contain is already included both in the subcategories of Category:en:Moons (Category:en:Moons of Jupiter etc), which are easier to maintain, and in the list templates (template:list:moons of Haumea/en etc). These Wikisaurus pages all seem to be unused (not linked to from mainspace). Smurrayinchester (talk) 12:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It does not matter that they do not list synonyms. Wikisaurus is about all semantic relations. E.g. Wikisaurus:bird is perfectly fine regardless of hosting almost no synonyms. And an overlap with categories is not a reason for deletion of a Wikisaurus entry. As for the moon pages, I abstain. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Abstain as the creator of all these pages, I don't particularly care if they survive or not in the Wikisaurus. But in any event, maybe these lists could be kept in appendices. --Daniel 07:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom ; use list templates (template:list:moons of Haumea/en, etc). - -sche (discuss) 06:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Eh, list templates are also stupid for those which only have a few moons. Just spell them out. - -sche (discuss) 08:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I've deleted [[Wikisaurus:moon of Haumea]] and [[template:list:moons of Haumea/en]], which only listed two moons; as noted above, other methods (such as categories and simple inclusion of the content in entries) is better for such cases. - -sche (discuss) 18:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as too granual and non-atomic for the theasaurus; switched from abstain. I copied the content of the nominated pages to WS:moon; they can now be all deleted. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Deleted the rest, as noone has expressed desire to keep.__Gamren (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)