Thread:User talk:CodeCat/"sc = None" and Latin script/reply (10)

The Phaistos disc might be a candidate. In any case, we can always give our own interpretation to these codes. So I suggest:


 * Zxxx - This may be intended for reconstructed languages, but since we write them anyway, this code doesn't really have any use for us. It probably should not be supported on Wiktionary.
 * Zyyy - It was written, but the script hasn't been set yet. I think we should use this instead of None.
 * Zzzz - Uncoded script. I'm not sure what "coded" means here, it could mean either not in Unicode or not in ISO. "Mani" has no encoding in Unicode but it is an ISO code, so it probably means "there is no ISO code for this script". We could use it as a placeholder until a code is created, either by ISO or by us. We could also use this as a base for deriving our own codes, like "Zzzz-Sogd" for Sogdian script, although the private use codes are probably better suited to that. It doesn't matter that the script is not in Unicode yet, because there may be private use scripts that contain them, and in any case the codes will still be used to list all the scripts of a language on its page, so we shouldn't remove them if they are valid.