Thread:User talk:CodeCat/*źambas, *zǫbъ/reply (3)

I found a source: Rick Derksen, Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon. It gives the form, but that's the same because o and a merged in Balto-Slavic. I'm not sure why he chose o and not a as the product of the merger, because as far as I know all of the evidence and consensus agrees with a. The same entry also gives as the Latvian form...?