Thread:User talk:CodeCat/*źambas, *zǫbъ/reply (9)

Also, here's a more general question. I see that alternate respellings of reconstructions (or even totally different reconstructed forms) already are in use in etymology sections of individual words, since I have come across some myself. So: should some kind of concerted effort be made to make everything consistent, i.e. should someone go looking for the "wrong" spellings of some reconstructed protoform and replace them with the "right" spellings? And what do we do if a source is cited, but it has the "wrong" spelling? (Maybe put the "right" spelling next to the "wrong" one in parenthesis? Or maybe leave the "wrong" spelling but link it to the "right" one?)