Thread:User talk:CodeCat/All Macedonian Entries/reply (6)

What is the debate about? I don't see how a list of all words in a language could be a bad thing.

I looked at the old discussion and the only dilemma seems to be whether to include only lemma forms, both lemma forms and non-lemma forms in one, or two separate lists, one for lemma forms and for non-lemma forms. In regard to this, I think that the lemma forms are much more useful than the non-lemma forms and that there should be a separate list for them. There could be another separate list for non-lemma forms too, but I don't find that so relevant. There could even be a mixed list, but not without two separate ones. Thus, I suggest: 1. Only lemma 2. Separate lemma and separate non-lemma 3. Separate lemma and separate non-lemma + combined list

I don't see how any of these choices are problematic. Maybe having some of these lists wouldn't be the most useful thing in the world, but then neither are categories about snakes, gardening tools, or whatnot. Furthermore, we can always reverse any change we make by removing whatever code we add to the headword-line templates, should there be some damage.

Anyway, I would personally create a lemma list and stick with that. I just need to find out what code to add and where.