Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Bot run to replace e.g. l ca ... with e.g. l/ca ... whenever possible./reply (3)

I think the name is ok personally, because it is easy to extend and doesn't differ too much from the original usage that people are accustomed to. We also have other templates that use language codes as subtemplates, and I don't think we'd want to change that in this specific case. So that leaves renaming the "l" part, but I don't really think there is a reason, it seems as clear as it can be now.

If you want to discuss it you can of course...