Thread:User talk:CodeCat/Cites

There is no reason to hold on rfv on an issue that is widely documented but frequently misunderstood.: The user who posted otherwise could use a history lesson. Wikipedia's article on Javascript explains the history quite well and has plenty of cites
 * "Understandably, JavaScript's connection with Java is regularly misunderstood. They are not the same thing."
 * "Java is a browser plugin, and is not the same thing as Javascript."
 * "Is JavaScript the same as Java? No. Enumerating all the things that Java can do which JavaScript cannot or vice versa will fill up an entire tome by itself"
 * "JavaScript is not the same as Java. I repeat: JavaScript is not the same as Java."